VirtualDataRoom.com
Compare providers
Real Asset Media Thought Leaders · May 13, 2026

Drooms CEO on longer deals, data sovereignty and running AI in-house

Drooms CEO and co-founder Alexandre Grellier on why M&A deals now take over a year to close, why digital sovereignty (where data lives and who owns it) has become a defining issue under GDPR, and why Drooms runs its own large language model in-house rather than sending customer data to public AI tools.

Real Asset Media Thought Leaders
Play this episode · 7 min Original source ↗
Key points
  • Drooms research shows deal durations rising to roughly 368 days on average.
  • More complex financing and deeper documentation demands are lengthening deals.
  • Digital sovereignty is about who owns the data and the company holding it, not just where it sits.
  • Drooms runs its own LLM on its servers rather than sending customer data to ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini.
  • AI improves efficiency but is not yet reliable enough to base decisions on.

When the head of a data room company talks about the market, the numbers tend to be self-serving. Alexandre Grellier, CEO and co-founder of Drooms, gave Real Asset Media something more concrete: his own platform's data showing that deals are simply taking longer to close.

“Where is my data going? And for us it's even worse, because we have to ask where is the data of our customers going?”

Alexandre Grellier, CEO, Drooms

Drooms' research puts the average deal at more than a year, around 368 days, and Grellier does not see it falling yet. The causes are structural. Financing has become far more complex, banks are asking for far more information, and the volume and depth of documentation flowing through the data room keeps growing. More information, more scrutiny, more time.

“If the company holding your data is not an EU-based, EU-owned company, it's pretty difficult to comply with GDPR.”

Alexandre Grellier

The more striking part of the conversation was about data. Digital sovereignty, Grellier argues, is no longer a niche compliance footnote but a defining question, and it is not only about where data physically sits. It is about who owns the company holding it. If that company is not EU-based and EU-owned, he says, complying with GDPR becomes genuinely difficult.

“People believe sometimes there's magic coming, and there's nothing magic. We're talking about large language models, predictions. They can be right, they can be wrong.”

Alexandre Grellier

That logic extends to AI, and it is where Drooms stakes out a position. Public tools like ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini do not hand over their source code, so they cannot be run inside Drooms' own environment, which means customer data would have to leave it. Drooms' answer is to run its own large language model on its own servers, compliant with the laws its clients operate under.

Grellier is unromantic about the technology itself. AI helps with efficiency and produces strong results in parts of the business, but it is not reliable enough to build everything on, and it is not magic. For a buyer weighing Drooms, that combination, EU ownership, in-house models, and a candid view of AI's limits, is a concrete answer to the question every dealmaker should be asking about where their most sensitive documents and the models reading them really live.

Why it matters

A clear differentiator for security-conscious dealmakers: Drooms' EU-owned, in-house AI stance directly addresses where sensitive data and the AI models touching it actually live.

Summary and analysis by VirtualDataRoom.com from the public episode. Play it above; the original source is linked there.

Drooms Read the full Drooms profile